Table of Contents

Overview of survey results taken December 15, 2006. Responses from 44 people (out of 44!)

Impact of RAD Lab

Interaction Frequency

Our hope in opening the RAD Lab was that people would both be here more and that people from different areas of expertise would get together to innovate across disciplines, either with formal meetings or serendipitously when, say, getting a coffee. In the 10 weeks since the lab has opened, have you had such interactions, either in a formal meeting or informally?

Interaction Testimonials

Testimonials on interactions.

Change in going to Soda Hall

Change since RAD Lab opened:

Likes and Dislikes of RAD Lab

Likes

Below are what people like about the RAD Lab, which I categorized roughly by topic in order of popularity. As many people make multiple points, I count number of times its mentioned in any comment, and the I picked a category to put each comment, usually because it was mentioned first. Thus (17,10) means mentioned 17 times, and I placed 10 comments as primarily in this category. Click to see each set of comments.

Ratings of 9 Topics

When asked to rate specific features of the lab, from highest average rating to lowest (Great, Good, Neutral, Irriating, Terrible):

- Big displays (Average rating Great) - Soft drinks (Great) - Refrigerator (Great) - Coffee machine (Good+) - Printer (Good+) - Meeting room availability (Good+) - Light at your desk (Good) - Noise at your desk (Good-) - Blinds (Good-)

While the average rating for the blinds and light were good, they had the 9 of the 10 ratings of “irritating.” The range on rating noise was neutral, good, or great.

Issues/Suggestions

We asked “What are issues that could be improved in the RAD Lab?” We got 21 responses, but compared to above, there is surprisingly little repitition in the concerns or suggestions. There are 4 comments of light and blinds mentioned above and 2 about visitors having to knock at the entrance. I put those at the top, but its probably best to just read the comments yourself to lead to a discussion about what can we do make things better in 2007.

Use of RAD Lab

Balance of working in the lab vs. at home

Number of days per week

* Distribution of number of days per week poeople spend in the RAD Lab, self-reported vs. impression of labmates

FIX TABLE {| border=“1” align=“center” !Days !Self report !Labmate impression

align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”
align=“right”

* See plot of use by time of day and day per week . Highlights: Noon-4: >80% Mon/Wed, >70% Tue/Thu, ~ 60% Fri 5PM -7: 67% Mon/Wed, ~60% Tue, ~ 50% Thu Saturday: >20% Noon to 4 Sunday: >20% Noon to 2

Makeup of RAD Lab

Results From Space Discussion

Action Items

* Add an extra row of chairs to board room * More people need to sign-up for Tuesday presentations